I completely understand why
this wasn’t nominated for an Oscar and I wish the French had put forward ‘Holy
Motors’ (which I really liked) instead of this film but oh well. I hear
Hollywood might remake it, which doesn’t surprise me (though I wish they
wouldn’t) because it so ‘feels like a Hollywood film’ – when I think of French
contemporary cinema (I haven’t seen much at all so I may not know what I’m
talking about) I think of quirkiness - as though they were trying to do the New
Wave again - intimately but never over
dramatically. This film is corny, it’s sentimental, at first glance it’s like a
Hollywood film. Yet, it feels so French. Like some notable
moments, for example when Driss humorously shaves Philippe’s moustache &
beard. Jokes are so brutally honest, and the piano-based score by Ludovico
Einaudi not only accompanies the story but entwines with it and pulls out raw feelings,
but never goes over-the-top. I was expecting corny typical Hollywood-imitating
drama but I got something slightly more exquisite.
14) The Deep Blue Sea dir. Terence Davies
SPOILER ALERT!!!
It was such a long time ago
that I saw this film but I still remember how ‘British’ and poetic I felt
everything to be, poetry not from what the characters said but more so from
what they never said, from the way they looked at each other (especially Rachel
Weisz, who was brilliant) and from the pauses between dialogue. I loved the
parallel between Hether’s self destructiveness and the scenes of destruction
from the war. And at the end when she loses everything she could easily have
crumbled to pieces again, yet she draws open the curtains in such a liberating
manner and the camera pans to a destroyed house in comparison. The underground scene
when she remembers the people gathered there to escape the bombing singing
together was magical and I still remember it vividly.
13) Django Unchained dir. Quentin Tarantino
SPOILER ALERT!!!
I enjoyed this film, it was
entertaining and the performances by the supporting cast (Christoph Waltz,
Leonardo DiCaprio & Samuel L Jackson) were absolutely terrific. Christoph
Waltz was the ‘good guy’ (which worked out well as we are comforted by the knowledge that this gun-loving dangerous man is on our side) and he supported Jamie Foxx so
well. Jamie Foxx by the way did a good job too, but his character Django
doesn’t actually give much input (until the final act) which I think is supposed
to be the case because he’s like a vessel,
he’s the subject and the story is what happens to him (does that make sense?) Leonardo
DiCaprio was the best thing about the film, playing the outrageously evil
Calvin Candie with just the right amount of drama. He didn’t get nominated though,
surprise surprise. And Samuel L Jackson’s character was so sinister and was
probably in fact the truest form of evil in the film. He is able to sense
immediately that there is something going on between Django and his wife and
where we (at least I) thought he might let them off or even assist them, he
‘betrays’ his own people/race and chooses to be loyal to Candie. I wish they
had developed his character more and shown more of him. In fact not just him
but Leo as well, and perhaps Waltz. That was my problem with the film. Instead
of going on and on extending scenes I felt they really didn’t need to, I wish
they’d shown more of the characters. And the final act was disappointing. It’s
Tarantino so there’s supposed to be mindless violence, but it was a little too
all over the place for me after Leo and Waltz died. All hell broke loose. I
think the satirical approach was supposed to emphasise the true horrors of
slavery and the violence involved, but it wasn’t successful. If I am to take
the film as pure entertainment and nothing more, it’s still disappointing
compared to his previous film ‘Inglorious Basterds’ for example, which was so
epic and just absolute fun. Compared to his previous films, this story was too
simple.
12) The Grey dir. Joe Carnahan
SPOILER ALERT!!!
I didn’t see this until recently because of the utterly misleading trailer. And Liam Neeson. It looks like just another survival film except this time there’s wolves as well – awesome! So of course the people who went to see it expecting that were disappointed. It’s not supposed to be taken literally at all. The characters are supposed to die one by one at each obstacle, Liam Neeson is supposed to be the only one alive at the end, the howling and growling of the wolves are supposed to sound over-the-top, it’s supposed to be unrealistic. Yet not have the plot lose its validity. Because it’s all a metaphor for life and death. Fear of death. Fear of living. The twist at the end was revealed so perfectly at the perfect time which turned everything on its head. The film was a wonderful little surprise and I wish they’d marketed it for the correct audience.
I didn’t see this until recently because of the utterly misleading trailer. And Liam Neeson. It looks like just another survival film except this time there’s wolves as well – awesome! So of course the people who went to see it expecting that were disappointed. It’s not supposed to be taken literally at all. The characters are supposed to die one by one at each obstacle, Liam Neeson is supposed to be the only one alive at the end, the howling and growling of the wolves are supposed to sound over-the-top, it’s supposed to be unrealistic. Yet not have the plot lose its validity. Because it’s all a metaphor for life and death. Fear of death. Fear of living. The twist at the end was revealed so perfectly at the perfect time which turned everything on its head. The film was a wonderful little surprise and I wish they’d marketed it for the correct audience.
11) Looper dir. Rian Johnson
SPOILER ALERT!!!
I don’t usually enjoy science
fiction/action but I was taken by surprise because of the originality of this
film’s idea. Though, the concept of needing to send people back in time to kill
them, no matter how strict or whatever the government has become in the future,
is ridiculous. In fact there’s tons of plot holes and absurdities, but you know
what, none of it matters! As Bruce Willis actually said at some point in the
film, “I don’t want talk about time travel because if we start talking about it
then we’re going to be here all day.” Which I thought was a way of Rian Johnson
telling us that he’s aware it doesn’t make total sense but let’s just sit back
and enjoy. And that is so easy to do here because of this whole enthralling
world and idea that he has brought to life. The film has been structured well I
think, I loved the pacing. Whether or not everything was accurate, young Joe
(Joseph Gordon-Levitt)’s actions changing Bruce Willis’ memories, that whole
idea of having your present self and older self existing in the same time frame
facing each other is so wonderfully absurd. The Cid storyline was very
entertaining. The idea of needing to stop/kill a little boy into becoming a future
evil force, his emotionally being affected by his parent/step-parent and the
love that he is given, his rage and his supernatural powers, all borderlining
sentimentality, for some reason reminds me of Japanese manga/anime and it’s
refreshing to see it here in this context, making it an all the more unique
experience. And the effort put into physically changing Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s
face without using CGI to look more like Bruce Willis’ has truly satisfying
effects for viewers. A brilliant scene that still remains vividly in my mind is
the one where older Seth’s body parts begin to disappear one by one, starting
with his fingers and then his nose. That was truly horrifying!
10) The Impossible dir. Juan Antonio Bayona
This is based on the true
story about one family’s experience of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Before
watching the film I wasn’t so sure if it was appropriate seeing as it was such
a terrible event, which also for me as a half Japanese person is reminiscent of
the 2011 tsunami/earthquake which hit Japan, but I decided to see it and I’m
glad I did. Like the title suggests, the family are torn apart but miraculously
all survive and find each other. It’s amazing because it’s a true story and
therefore I think it was necessary in fact, for people to see it as a symbol of
hope. That such an extraordinary thing can actually happen. And towards the end
as the family make their way onto their private plane provided by their travel
insurance, as they walk past the masses of people in despair, grieving and in
agony, it reminds us, in case anybody had got carried away, that this is in no
way a happy ending. I’ve seen some people complain about the sappy use of the
camera, the sentimentality in how for example the sound is muted when Naomi Watts
is thrashed under water etc, but I don’t know how to respond to that… I suppose
I agree. When Tom Holland, his younger brothers and Ewan McGreggor find each
other outside the hospital, that is another example of extremely cheesy filming
and use of music. But the truth is that they did find each other, the miracle
did in fact happen, so why not be dramatic with the use of camera was the
mentality behind the director I suppose..? But at the end of the film I do not
feel like any of them had been glorified in any way or presented like heroes.
So I suppose it’s okay. Naomi Watts was wonderful, as was Tom Holland who
played the eldest son.
9) Beasts of the Southern
Wild dir. Benh Zeitlin
Once again I didn’t see this film until
recently because I thought it was going to be just a child point of view
fantasy film. Yes it was that, but I had no idea how rich and mystical the
fantasy was going to be. It’s ultimately about Hushpuppy ‘growing up’ but the
beauty of this film is in how it’s structured and told visually from her perspective
and the layers of the characters and what everything in the film represents.
Everybody will take something different from it and have completely different
experiences. The performances are incredible, especially Quvenzhane Wallis (though nominating her for an Oscar is a bit too much I think).
8) Skyfall
dir. Sam Mendes
SPOILER ALERT!!!
Sam Mendes
did a truly amazing job here and it was fitting as the 50th
anniversary Bond. Thematically, the suggestion that Bond was becoming too old
was of course representative of the franchise itself as well. The opening
chase/fighting sequence was awesome and gripping and the transition from his
falling into the water into the opening credits with the brilliant ‘Skyfall’
sung by Adele gave me goosebumps. Javier Bardem was introduced in that
memorable continuous shot and in that scene facing M the acting was top-notch.
So wonderfully chilling and creepy! Ben Whishaw was an interesting addition as
Q, though to be honest his hacking scenes were a bit ridiculous. But I loved
his introductory scene with Daniel Craig. At the end after reaching Skyfall the
disappointment started. I read that the role played by Albert Finney was
actually originally written for Sean Connery, and that seemed ridiculous at
first but now that I think about it, it would’ve been so awesome! Imagine the
reactions of the audience! It would have made no sense in that he is Bond so it
isn’t possible, but it would’ve instantly translated to us as the ‘father
figure’ - Bond going back to his roots. Instead we get Albert Finney appearing
suddenly out of nowhere and sticking around for the rest of the film, still
there even in the final scene when M dies. The whole M mother figure dying in
his arms was nice, and I really liked the moment when Javier Bardem sees the
tombstones of Craig’s parents. It’s sentimental but not too sentimental. Overall
a great story with fitting themes and little things like the Aston Martin, the
final scene which ties nicely to the very first Bond film, the brilliant
cinematography, the all-star cast and soundtrack which nicely complements the
film, make Skyfall not just a great Bond film but a great film on its own. If a
Bond film was ever going to be nominated for Best Picture this had to be it,
but it wasn’t. I guess it will never happen then :(
7) The
Imposter dir. Bart
Layton
SPOILER ALERT!!!
What a
bizarre and incredible story! This is a brilliant example of the unreliable
narrative as it’s told from the perspective of this pathological liar. It’s a
documentary but it really perfectly combines documentary style and film style, for
example overlapping his mouthing of words with his recollections (reconstructed
footage) which has such a sinister effect. Later in the film there is the whole
suggestion of the family murdering their son and things had been shot in a way
to make that seem believable. Which brings me to the point that if they were in
fact innocent I feel slightly bad for them. But I suppose it’s been made clear
that this is merely his account of what happened and thus we probably should
doubt him seeing as he’s a natural ‘imposter’. I wish they hadn’t ended the
film like that though, so ambiguously. It leaves this eerie and disturbing
feeling which is probably good, but it’s so unsatisfying.
6) Moonrise Kingdom dir. Wes Anderson
This was
such a sweet and adorable film about innocence and also I think hope, told
straightforwardly but enchantingly. I loved the strong sense of place and the
colours & general cinematography of the film. The supporting cast was an
ensemble of some great actors – Edward Norton, Bruce Willis, Bill Murray etc,
but the 2 leads Jared Gilman and Kara Heywood weren’t overshadowed at all, in fact
they really shone. Wes Anderson made use of their inexperienced (they were both
first time actors) innocence and freshness to his advantage, combined it with
magical Wes Anderson-ness and came up with this wonderful film which felt
play-like.
5) Argo dir. Ben Affleck
This had me
on the edge of my seat pretty much the whole time. I loved the script (by Chris
Terrio), loved the suspense, loved how fluid it felt and loved the paralleling
between scenes of the hostages and the whole science fiction film element. This
was based on a true story but it was clear some things were altered, added or
removed in order to make the film a more dramatic experience, which is something that I've grown to not mind (depending on the subject matter). In this case it only annoyed me
towards the end at the runway of the airport because what was being shown was just impossible
and ridiculous, but overall Argo was an extremely engaging and tense, enjoyable
experience and I was hooked from the introductory sequence combining comic book
strips and documentary footage.
4) Seven
Psychopaths dir. Martin McDonagh
This was thoroughly
entertaining and also very unique. It’s about a screenwriter struggling with
writer’s block trying to write a screenplay called ‘Seven Psychopaths’ based on
the 'psychopathic' people around him and the things that consequently happen. There’s
a lot of Tarantino-esque violence but as the protagonist Colin Farrell seems to feel, I
think it strives ultimately to say something about such violence, raise
questions, even suggest that it's stupid, and I think it succeeds humorously while being a violent and entertaining film. Which I've explained badly but I'm hoping you'll understand if you see the film. The characters were brilliant, notably the supporting actors Sam
Rockwell and Christopher Walken, and once again as with Martin McDonagh’s previous
film 'In Bruges', I love the dialogue!
3) Life of Pi dir. Ang Lee
SPOILER ALERT!!!
I really wish I’d seen this
in 3D. I’ve never seen a film in 3D so I can’t say for sure but the film really
made me think that if it’s for a film like this, if 3D is going to be used
‘correctly’, then it will no doubt be spectacular. I never thought I’d like a
film with such heavy use of CGI so much. It really surprised me and that’s why
it’s climbed this high up the list. By the time Pi and the tiger were alone in
the little boat there was still half the film left to go so I wondered what was
going to happen. How is Ang Lee going to stretch this section out for so long
to depict the sense of endlessness and starvation without boring us? But one
after another came visual spectacles which just wowed and stunned me. The beginning part of the film was nothing exciting but after finishing the film I accepted it,
not in the sense that I was 'forgiving' it because the rest of the film turned
out to be great, but because those themes of self-searching, growing up and
seeking a 'God' needed to be presented to us first for us to make sense of it
all in the end. The ending initially disappointed me because I just couldn’t
believe they’d told this entire magical story to us and then in a matter of
seconds said that in fact none of it actually happened, but then I soon
understand that was the point. The story isn’t a survival film or a fantasy film
but is a metaphor for faith; what we experience and what we feel depends on
whether or not we have faith and where it lies in. Suraj Sharma did an amazing
job in his debut feature film.
2) Silver Linings Playbook dir. David O. Russell
SPOILER ALERT!!!
This film is so brilliantly
done. Ultimately in terms of genre and plot structure I suppose it's pretty
conventional and predictable, but if this makes any sense, at the same time it
feels so unconventional and unpredictable as it is executed so well in every
aspect. It’s not just a love story but it’s also about family, notably father
and son. They even had to cast Jackie Weaver as the mother even though I’m sure
anybody could’ve played her, but just to make everything perfect they did – the
film’s been nominated for all 4 Academy Award acting categories. The American
football element was nice, the dance element was surprising but wonderful, and
the dance itself is a bipolar dance with ‘ups’ and ‘downs’. I don’t know anyone
with bipolar but I’m very familiar with mental health issues and I thought
Bradley Cooper and J-Law both played their characters believably and
sympathetically. This theme was what attracted me to the film in the first
place. I loved the ending - the characters really deserved it. I don’t think
it’s just corny and irrationally concluding things to make it a ‘feel good
ending’ – the brief scenes of Cooper and J-Law being happily together at
the end having found each other also conveyed a strong sense that the road
ahead will continue to be bumpy.
1) Holy Motors dir. Leos Carax
For the first half of the
film it was more like Holy Shit because I wasn’t comprehending anything. And
there isn’t any specific moment in the film where things are made clear, we all
make our own interpretations, and the interpretation I made was that this film
was about how humans ‘act’ their lives as though they were on camera, and
nowadays cameras are literally scattered around everywhere and we
subconsciously play characters as opposed to actually live. That seems like
quite a bland and simplified explanation, but when I was watching it I’m sure I
had a more interesting eureka moment of understanding. Of course it's also a tribute to cinema itself I think, stretching out as far as possible to show us what film can do. Holy Motors was certainly the most mesmerising, mind blogging and
satisfying film of the year for me!
Note: I haven't seen Paul Thomas Anderson's 'The Master' which looks like the kind of film I'd like. I think it may have been on this list had I seen it.
Note: I haven't seen Paul Thomas Anderson's 'The Master' which looks like the kind of film I'd like. I think it may have been on this list had I seen it.
No comments:
Post a Comment