I’ve excluded Side Effects and The Paperboy
from the list since I already wrote about them earlier this year and I think The
Paperboy is considered a 2012 film anyway. So without further ado, my top 5
of 2013 so far (no spoilers):
5) Upstream Color dir. Shane Carruth
I wouldn’t exactly say that I enjoyed this film (especially the first viewing) but it had my brain racing and asking questions
for its entire duration. The narrative is far from linear so if you
don’t like your mind getting f***ed then this may not be for you. That being
said, it’s not in any way an unpleasant experience; there isn’t really anything
disturbing except for the fact that you may not understand what’s going on and
that might get on your nerves. There was a sense that maybe some things were
purposely made to look more confusing then they were - I’m pretty sure the film
would have been just as compelling had they made things a bit clearer. Whatever
your level of comprehension throughout the film, the ending should be
satisfying. I’ll admit that I still don’t completely understand it, and there
is of course more than one interpretation, as there is with any piece of abstract
art. But what I can say for sure is that the central theme is that of identity
– losing it, and finding it again. Are we in control of our lives? Are we a
tiny little part of a much larger something? It’s not like anything I’ve ever
experienced before and I highly recommend it if you’re looking for something
new.
4) Dans la maison (In the House) dir. François Ozon
This film completely seduces you, much like the way the
teenage protagonist has his literature professor completely hooked with his
writing. The professor gets a little too nosy and involved, and what results is
a mysteriously riveting interfusion of fiction and reality. The initial
motivation for the protagonist is his friend’s mother – he wants to be near her,
he wants to write about her, so he spends a lot of time at this house. From
there it dives into the unpredictable and shows us the anatomy of not just the
house but the human imagination. It’s paced brilliantly, looks gorgeous, it’s
psychological but doesn’t get too dark – it’s actually quite humorous – it’s
sly, it’s clever, it’s audacious, it’s an absolutely delightful experience. Sorry,
it feels like forever ago when I saw this one so my memory is quite hazy; as
you can tell I’m waffling.
3) Stuck in Love dir. Josh Boone
This one’s also about writing – I’m a sucker for films about
writing! As an experience I wouldn’t say it’s superior to Dans la maison, but
I’m ranking this 3rd because it surprised me and I like being
surprised. In terms of realism, yes, it glamorises writing (they basically
chill out and be all artsy and somehow off-screen all the writing gets done)
and it’s a little too tidy, but given its genre I can let that slide. It’s
surprisingly authentic, it’s engaging, there’s heart and soul – it surpasses
the average romcom by a mile. As I mentioned, sure it’s not realistic, but
there’s someone you’ll most definitely be able to relate to. I found myself
genuinely caring for the characters, and as predictable it may have been, it
was so heart-warming and sweet that I didn’t care. It’s a film that makes you
want to write!
2) The Great Gatsby dir. Baz Luhrmann
Not being biased because it's DiCaprio, but he was fantastic! From the moment he appears (about 30mins or so into the
film) he steadily guides you along for the rest of the ride – his presence is monumental,
he is Jay Gatsby. His delivery of dialogue, the purposeful way he says ‘old
sport’, the way he looks – I can’t imagine anyone else (haven’t seen the
Redford version – sorry!) That first half hour or so before he appears is just chaotic
though. It was all over the place, yes, illustrating the menace of the roaring
20s, but it was too much for me. You have to give Luhrmann
credit for trying – and what a bold attempt! For me it all works so well: the
colours, the music, the pace, the significance of the green light, it all on
some deep level fuses into one giant explosion. In the novel Fitzgerald’s virtuoso writing had created this
world too colourful and chaotic that it felt hollow, and I thought Luhrmann
managed to do a job as good with his auteurship. Amidst the disillusion that he
successfully creates, he manifests a powerful existential yearning which you
can’t help but be sucked into and moved by. Some people have accused Luhrmann
of turning it into a love story, and while I agree that some of those who
haven’t read the novel may think that way, I hope that a more unwavering viewer
would be able to see beyond the characters for what they represent. Every
single performance was fantastic in this film – even Tobey Maguire, who is
supposed to be an awkward and a bit of an unreliable Nick Carraway.
1) Mud dir. Jeff Nichols
This is, without doubt, pure brilliance. While the other
films in this post you may or may not like depending on your taste, this one I
recommend to all; if you are human you will enjoy it. It might still be showing
in some cinemas so if you see it playing, consider yourself lucky and go see
it! It’s storytelling at its best. You can tell Jeff Nichols took his time to
really map things out and develop character arcs - masterfully done. There’s a
boat stuck in a tree: we’re intrigued. So are the two young boys played
brilliantly by Tye Sheridan (the youngest kid in Tree of Life) and Jacob
Lofland, whose curiosity leads them to meddle with McConaughey's character’s
affairs. By the way, when did Matthew McConaughey suddenly become awesome? His last few films have been brilliant, and his
performance in this film is the best by him I’ve seen. The story is as
compelling as the boat in the tree or McConaughey's mysterious character;
it’s enchanting but at the same time raw and muddy (no pun intended). It’s a
coming-of-age tale about love, family and friendship, character-driven with an
incredibly strong sense of place. Its storytelling methods are pretty
traditional, a fresh, original story written and executed so well – it’s an
absolute gem which I cannot recommend highly enough.
Honourable mentions:
Like Someone In Love dir. Abbas Kiarostami
I read somewhere that the director was in Tokyo
looking out from a car window when he got the idea for this film (or something
along those lines). Not only was the act of being in a vehicle a reoccurring motif in this multicultural film, but that’s also how this experience felt like for me: loneliness
viewed from a non-Japanese person’s POV from a couple of feet away. It takes a
look at identity and mistaken identity; communication and miscommunication, perception, judgement... In
fact it’s about a whole load of things which may not even cross your mind while
you’re watching it. There are some heartbreaking moments, most notably
during a sequence inside a taxi which takes place in the first act. Like the taxi
driver who probably gets an idea of what’s going on but can’t (or shouldn’t) intervene,
we can’t do anything about it either. People have to keep their distance – the
film is a look on intimacy and the lack of it as well. The boundary between the
viewer and camera is very clear (a lot of the things happen off screen); I
still haven’t quite figured out the reasoning behind Kiarostami’s camera angles
and POV choices, but hopefully with more thought it’ll become clearer. While the mismatch of what you see and what you hear may or may not bother you, it's an otherwise very easy-on-the-eyes elegantly shot film with an ending which has stirred up a lot of debate.
The Place Beyond the Pines dir. Derek Cianfrance
I appreciate what this film tries to do, and the first two
acts are brilliant - but the third disappoints. For such an intimate and
naturalistic build up, the pay off is far too unrealistic and forced - sudden
too (a certain title card), to the point that it made the overall experience
more disappointing than positive. It won't be a spoiler to tell you that basically its comprised of the stories of these two men and then their sons. I’m sure the director’s intention wasn’t for
us to find the events of the film believable; I’d say his take was a
mythological one, which would naturally involve fateful chance happenings. It
just didn’t click that way for me and it seemed like it was trying to be what
it simply wasn’t. That being said, I admire what he strove to do and I’m only
disappointed because the first two acts were that good (near-perfect) and
showed so much promise. The lead performances were brilliant – Ryan Gosling
fits into the role nicely and Bradley Cooper seems to be getting better and better.
No comments:
Post a Comment